AskCyborg uses multi-agent analyst debate to produce the part of an argument that survived stress-testing, not the consensus that nobody pushed back on. The Cyborg Score (1-10) is the synthesized rating across seven dimensions and hundreds of data points per company.
Most company-research products produce a single perspective: one analyst writes one report, one consensus rating. The reader gets whatever that analyst already believed.
AskCyborg does the opposite. Every company goes through a panel of AI analysts arguing with each other about each material claim — bull vs. bear, strategic strengths vs. structural risks, named competitive pressures, financial-health signals vs. headline noise. Each major claim is challenged by an opposing analyst, defended, and either survives or gets rewritten.
What appears in the final report is only the part that survived the debate. Claims that fell apart under stress-testing get filtered out. Claims that held up but with caveats get the caveats attached.
The audio briefing (~15 minutes per company) is an edited version of the actual debate. Listeners hear the disagreement directly rather than getting the smoothed-over consensus.
Millions of public and private companies across 195 countries. Coverage extends beyond the largest names — early-stage private companies, regional mid-caps, public companies on emerging-market exchanges, and recently-funded startups all get the same analyst-debate treatment.
AskCyborg publishes an official Model Context Protocol server so AI assistants like Claude, Cursor, Cline, Continue, Windsurf, and ChatGPT can call the corpus directly. Install in 10 seconds →